Rose-tinted views of the Asian model for caring for
the elderly aside, when Jeremy Hunt highlighted the problem of loneliness among
the UK ’s
ageing population last Friday, the one thing that most people could agree on is
that loneliness presents a threat to one’s health.
The results of the BBC survey which triggered the Tory
politician, himself married to a Chinese national from Xian, to wage war on
loneliness among Britain ’s
elderly were branded by him as a source of “national shame”.
The health secretary controversially said we should
follow the Chinese in looking after our elderly relatives at home. Furthermore,
we should only use residential care as, “… a last rather than a first option”, something
we could be forgiven in thinking is already the case.
The idea that the Chinese, or nationals of any other
Asian nation, care for their elderly in a superior manner to the way we do in
the UK
is rather assumptive.
China, like the rest of the world, has seen rapid
urbanisation and a decline in the number of people looking after their ageing
relatives in the same household; so much so, in fact, that a much ridiculed law
was enacted in July this year to enforce visits by children to their ageing
parents.
The UK ,
like China ,
faces the challenge of an increasing older population which requires support. Yet
under Theresa May’s amended family migration rules, introduced in July 2012, we
have seen the erosion of the family’s ability to care for the elderly.
Under the rules, the visa criteria for adult dependents
of British citizens who wish to come to the UK have been tightened to the point
they are virtually impossible to meet. The rules require the dependent to be in
need of care to perform everyday tasks and for no person in their country of
residence to be able to provide such care.
The rules also prevent many Brits who are married to
non-EEA nationals from returning to the UK to care for their elderly
relatives since sponsors must now be able to demonstrate an annual income of
GBP 18,600 a year in order to qualify as a sponsor. But, alas, Hunt, himself a
millionaire, has overlooked this financial hurdle.
As a result of the rules, we are certain to see many
more elderly abandoned by their children, either abroad or in the UK , not to
mention a possible increase in the bill of state care as isolated old people
are forced to resort to welfare. One of the many sad things about this
abandonment is that it will not be through choice.
Grandparents will continue to be denied the pleasure
of witnessing their grandchildren grow up and the elderly will continue to
battle through sickness without the support of their children. Yet Hunt thinks
we should learn from Asian cultures that supposedly have “reverence and respect
for older people”.
When cherry-picking issues to highlight, Hunt
conveniently ignored the fact that loneliness affects people of all ages. A
recent study on age and loneliness in Europe found only a two percent
difference in the number of elderly people having reported feelings of
loneliness compared with the young, while the Mental Health Foundation has
found old people to be less likely to feel lonely than young people.
If these studies are accurate, we should be as
concerned about the loneliness of people of all ages as we are with the loneliness of older generations. So what about Brits married to non-EEA
partners who are forced into singledom due to visa restrictions? Many who fall
into this category haven’t seen their spouses or children for months, even
years, often for financial or language reasons alone.
So we see a conflict of interests: as Hunt tries to
reduce loneliness, May is intent on increasing it, not just by keeping families
from living together in the same household, but by keeping them from living in
the same country. Now that is a shocker to top even Hunt’s distorted view of China ’s
traditionally family-centred culture.
Perhaps before rushing to follow a questionable social
model for caring for the elderly from abroad, a few minor domestic
modifications would go a long way in reducing the UK ’s loneliness ranking.
No comments:
Post a Comment