Wednesday night roundup
Ian Birrell | Families that need £18,600 to spend Christmas together: The shameful earnings threshold imposed on British citizens wanting to bring their foreign spouses here.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/families-that-need-18600-to-spend-christmas-together-the-shameful-earnings-threshold-imposed-on-british-citizens-wanting-to-bring-their-foreign-spouses-here-9013882.html
'Like any father, Ethan James Feltham was looking forward to Christmas with his wife and their new son. But instead he must pack up the presents and put them in the post, for his young family will spend the festive period 10,000 miles apart from each other on different sides of the world. “It’s just so disappointing,” he told me ruefully.
'This man may have risked his life in Afghanistan as a member of the armed forces, but British bureaucrats do not believe his Fijian wife – met through a military friend – will leave if she comes to stay. And although he works some 60 hours a week as a restaurant chef, the 23-year-old’s earnings fall a few hundred pounds short of the shameful earnings threshold imposed on British citizens wanting to bring their spouses to live here.'
Divided families stories : http://britcits.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/stories
---
Migrants' Rights Network :
http://www.migrantsrights.org.uk/blog/2013/12/families-kept-apart-christmas-visit-visa-restrictions
'This week’s searing assessment of the family migration rules by Archbishop Vincent Nichols hit the nail on the head. Since the Government tightened the regulations for families coming to the UK in July last year, we’ve heard from hundreds of British people who have suddenly found that they no longer qualify to live with their spouse or partner in the UK as their earnings are too low or their wider circumstances do not fit the rules.
'But as ever with the immigration system, changes in one area have a knock-on effect in another. This October we were contacted by a friend, David, who rang us from Heathrow airport, and was beside himself with worry. David’s Canadian wife, Dee, has as yet been unable to join him permanently in the UK as he earns less than £18,600 a year. She was due to arrive for a visit to see him this October. Although as a Canadian national she doesn’t need a visa to come to the UK, she underwent prolonged questioning by the border officials...'
---
Runformywife | Hannah and I were guests on the peoples voice with Sonia Poulton this evening.
Runformywife on Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/groups/228044687371545/
'Thank you so much to the People's Voice for giving us the chance to tell our story and hopefully make more people aware of what we and so many others are going through.'
http://www.thepeoplesvoice.tv/
Hannah and James : http://britcits.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/hannah-and-james-american-hannah-and.html
The Runformywife campaign : http://britcits.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/run-for-my-wife.html
---
Migrants' Manifesto | Dignity has no nationality.
http://www.freemovement.org.uk/2013/12/18/dignity-has-no-nationality-our-day-2013/
'It is inevitable that the poor treatment of migrants today will be our dishonour tomorrow.'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=t1w5FyXq7kk
---
https://twitter.com/SueLukes :
With @migrants_rights at discussion of #whoisdayanicristal. Astonishing film you MUST see when released in April
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWsufB97E_A
http://www.whoisdayanicristal.com/
---
A Christmas greeting from Ireland :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RUtq_EOrJg&feature=youtu.be
By a Surinder Singh couple - more on free movement :
http://britcits.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/surinder%20singh
---
MPs and bishops step into same boat as impoverished migrants.
http://www.thetablet.co.uk/news/218/0/mps-and-bishops-step-into-same-boat-as-impoverished-migrants
Showing posts with label catholic church. Show all posts
Showing posts with label catholic church. Show all posts
Wednesday, 18 December 2013
Sunday, 15 December 2013
Archbishop of Westminster Vincent Nichols attacks immigration targets.
Vincent Nichols, Archbishop of Westminster :
I have witnessed the trauma our supposedly pro-marriage government is inflicting on thousands of families and their children
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/dec/15/uk-immigration-policy-britons-spouses-trauma
'Recently I met a group of people who were so traumatised that at times they found it difficult to speak. It was a harrowing meeting, although a necessary one. Those who are so distressed find great help in being listened to. But I was left feeling helpless, such is their plight.
'The people I met are all victims of the new regulations regarding foreign spouses of British nationals coming to live in the United Kingdom. These new immigration rules were introduced in July 2012 and are ruthlessly applied against British citizens seeking to establish a marital home here.
'The people I met were citizens of this country, holders of British passports. All of them, however, were broken-hearted because they were not permitted to bring their wives or husbands to live here. In each case there was going to be no call on the public purse – in fact each excluded spouse would be an earner and a taxpayer, not a benefits claimant. Yet protection of the public purse is the constant argument from our government on limiting immigration. From what I was being told, this argument is false and misleading...'
---
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/dec/15/archbishop-westminster-vincent-nichols-attacks-immigration-targets
'The most senior Catholic in England and Wales has branded the government's pursuit of immigration targets as "inhumane" and warned that rules preventing foreign spouses of UK citizens from settling here was damaging the development of thousands of British children.
'In a rare political intervention, Vincent Nichols, the archbishop of Westminster, urged the government to change a policy introduced last summer that prevents British people living with spouses who come from outside the European Union unless they can show an annual income of at least £18,600, well above the £12,855 of the minimum wage.
'The measure was a scandal, Nichols said, adding: "Anyone truly concerned for the family as the building block of society, and realistic about the mobility of British people today, must see both the folly of this policy and how it is an affront to the status of British citizenship.
"The government's intention with these new regulations is to cut the number of immigrants from outside the European Union," Nichols writes in Monday's Guardian. "But in doing so, is it the government's intention to penalise British citizens? To undermine marriages and to split up families?
'... Nichols's attack on the coalition's immigration policies comes amid MPs' deliberation of an immigration bill, which is at the committee stage in the Commons. He spoke after a meeting at his Westminster residence with British passport-holders affected by the ruling. He said they were so traumatised and "broken-hearted" that at times they found it difficult to speak. (Ed. : I was there. It was very mentally and emotionally draining).
'In each case the spouse who was prevented from coming to the UK was not going to be drawing any benefits, Nichols said, which he said suggested to him the government's argument that immigration must be constrained to safeguard the public purse was "false and misleading".
'This summer, the all-party parliamentary group on migration chaired by the Liberal Democrat peer Lady Hamwee published a report into the new system that concluded there was "a strong case for these rules to be reviewed". It took evidence from 45 families whose inability to meet the income requirement had led to the separation of children, including British children, from a non-European parent or wider family members.
'Jan Brulc, a spokesman for the Migrants' Rights Network, which introduced victims of the policy to the archbishop, said it has heard from more than 200 families adversely affected by the new rule. The Home Office's own impact assessment indicated as many as 17,800 families could be affected.
'... The shadow home secretary, Yvette Cooper, called for a swift review of the policy. "When people bring family back to this country they do need to make sure they can support each other," she said.
"But the government were warned that the inflexibility of their system would lead to unfairness and injustice. For example if a British citizen is working part-time or at home looking after children they can be unable to bring a spouse back to Britain even if they are earning far more than the threshold and could easily support the entire family. The real problem is that Theresa May's net migration target treats all migration the same and doesn't distinguish between different types of immigration or look at the impact."
Vincent Nichols, Archbishop of Westminster :
I have witnessed the trauma our supposedly pro-marriage government is inflicting on thousands of families and their children
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/dec/15/uk-immigration-policy-britons-spouses-trauma
'Recently I met a group of people who were so traumatised that at times they found it difficult to speak. It was a harrowing meeting, although a necessary one. Those who are so distressed find great help in being listened to. But I was left feeling helpless, such is their plight.
'The people I met are all victims of the new regulations regarding foreign spouses of British nationals coming to live in the United Kingdom. These new immigration rules were introduced in July 2012 and are ruthlessly applied against British citizens seeking to establish a marital home here.
'The people I met were citizens of this country, holders of British passports. All of them, however, were broken-hearted because they were not permitted to bring their wives or husbands to live here. In each case there was going to be no call on the public purse – in fact each excluded spouse would be an earner and a taxpayer, not a benefits claimant. Yet protection of the public purse is the constant argument from our government on limiting immigration. From what I was being told, this argument is false and misleading...'
---
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/dec/15/archbishop-westminster-vincent-nichols-attacks-immigration-targets
'The most senior Catholic in England and Wales has branded the government's pursuit of immigration targets as "inhumane" and warned that rules preventing foreign spouses of UK citizens from settling here was damaging the development of thousands of British children.
'In a rare political intervention, Vincent Nichols, the archbishop of Westminster, urged the government to change a policy introduced last summer that prevents British people living with spouses who come from outside the European Union unless they can show an annual income of at least £18,600, well above the £12,855 of the minimum wage.
'The measure was a scandal, Nichols said, adding: "Anyone truly concerned for the family as the building block of society, and realistic about the mobility of British people today, must see both the folly of this policy and how it is an affront to the status of British citizenship.
"The government's intention with these new regulations is to cut the number of immigrants from outside the European Union," Nichols writes in Monday's Guardian. "But in doing so, is it the government's intention to penalise British citizens? To undermine marriages and to split up families?
'... Nichols's attack on the coalition's immigration policies comes amid MPs' deliberation of an immigration bill, which is at the committee stage in the Commons. He spoke after a meeting at his Westminster residence with British passport-holders affected by the ruling. He said they were so traumatised and "broken-hearted" that at times they found it difficult to speak. (Ed. : I was there. It was very mentally and emotionally draining).
'In each case the spouse who was prevented from coming to the UK was not going to be drawing any benefits, Nichols said, which he said suggested to him the government's argument that immigration must be constrained to safeguard the public purse was "false and misleading".
'This summer, the all-party parliamentary group on migration chaired by the Liberal Democrat peer Lady Hamwee published a report into the new system that concluded there was "a strong case for these rules to be reviewed". It took evidence from 45 families whose inability to meet the income requirement had led to the separation of children, including British children, from a non-European parent or wider family members.
'Jan Brulc, a spokesman for the Migrants' Rights Network, which introduced victims of the policy to the archbishop, said it has heard from more than 200 families adversely affected by the new rule. The Home Office's own impact assessment indicated as many as 17,800 families could be affected.
'... The shadow home secretary, Yvette Cooper, called for a swift review of the policy. "When people bring family back to this country they do need to make sure they can support each other," she said.
"But the government were warned that the inflexibility of their system would lead to unfairness and injustice. For example if a British citizen is working part-time or at home looking after children they can be unable to bring a spouse back to Britain even if they are earning far more than the threshold and could easily support the entire family. The real problem is that Theresa May's net migration target treats all migration the same and doesn't distinguish between different types of immigration or look at the impact."
Thursday, 9 May 2013
Finally, the Catholic Church shows some backbone (and more on the Queen's Speech).
http://www.thetablet.co.uk/latest-news/5280
The Archbishop of Westminster has accused the Government of harming families with its strict immigrant rules, during a Mass where others voiced criticism of UK policies on asylum seekers and the deportation of refugees.
In his homily at Westminster Cathedral on Monday, Archbishop Nichols warned that current immigration laws hurt families hoping to be reunited in the United Kingdom. Rules that came into effect last year mean that people must earn £18,600 or more per year to bring a non-EU spouse into the country and £22,400 for one child.
"Economic and time-period thresholds [...] are putting great strain on the vital unit of the family and could be seen as actually putting a price tag on the value of family unity," he said. He continued: "Surely it is for the common good that immigration policies must be more sensitively shaped in such matters."
The bidding prayers prayed "for people who do not welcome foreigners." The prayers also asked for policies that do not deny asylum seekers dignity and urged the UK Government to fulfil its obligation under the United Nations to respond in a humane and compassionate way to refugees.
The Good Samaritan.
Woman, 81, left to starve after immigration raid on care company.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/may/09/woman-left-to-starve-raid-care-company
Gloria Foster, 81, a frail widow with dementia, was entirely dependent on four daily visits from carers, who fed her, helped her get out of bed and gave her medicine. But for nine days in January she was left to starve after an immigration raid on the private care company contracted to look after her.
Somehow in the days following the raid and closure of the agency Carefirst24, the local authority forgot about her. She was discovered on a chance visit by a district nurse and taken to hospital, where she died in early February.
As we now know, UK immigration policy is extreme enough to victimise British citizens - even those whose families have been here for many centuries - too :
http://britcits.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/stories
---
https://twitter.com/JCWInews tweets :
Landlords failing to check for gas leaks - how on earth can they be trusted to check immigration status of tenants?
http://www.insidehousing.co.uk/tenancies/landlords-failing-to-carry-out-gas-checks/6526874.article
---
GPs must not be the new border agency in policing access to the NHS: RCGP reaction to Queen's speech.
http://www.rcgp.org.uk/news/gps-must-not-be-the-new-border-agency-in-policing-access-to-the-nhs.aspx
The Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) has today warned against the danger of turning GPs into a form of immigration control - and cautioned the Government against plugging the social care funding gap by raiding the NHS budget, in its reaction to the Queen's speech.
RCGP Chair Dr Clare Gerada said:
"GPs must not be a new 'border agency' in policing access to the NHS. Whilst the health system must not be abused and we must bring an end to health tourism, it is important that we do not overestimate the problem and that GPs are not placed in the invidious position of being the new border agency.
"General Practice must remain the main access to health care within the NHS. GPs have a duty of care to all people seeking healthcare, and should not be expected to police access to healthcare and turn people away when they are at their most vulnerable. It is important to protect individuals and public health."
https://twitter.com/JCWInews tweets :
JCWI welcomes the statement by the Royal College of General Practitioners. Doctors not Border Guards!
Hippocrates.
Britain should welcome, not oppose, immigration. Must-read by Oliver Kamm of the Times.
http://timesopinion.tumblr.com/post/50007265835/britain-should-welcome-not-oppose-immigration
The Conservative Party has an important and historically sometimes dominant strand within it that is internationalist (including pro-Europeanism), pragmatic and in, the broadest sense, liberal. It’s dismaying that, on the evidence of the Queen’s Speech, that current appears to be in abeyance.
I’m not so worried about the absence from the Speech of legislation for same-sex marriage. I’ve supported that cause for around 20 years (not longer, I’m sorry to say, as I had previously failed to grasp how central the issue was to civil rights and citizenship), and am proud to have helped construct The Times’s recent arguments on it. There are no good arguments for delay and strong conservative reasons for pressing ahead. But I’m confident that this will happen; and when it does, the reform will not only be irreversible but accepted very quickly as a natural and just state of affairs.
It’s disturbing, however, that the Queen’s Speech dwelt to such an extent on proposals to deter people from coming to the UK. Immigration has economic and social benefits. Immigrants fill gaps in the labour market and, generally being of working age, contribute more to the Exchequer in taxes than they take out in benefits (including education spending). There is some evidence that immigration affects the wages of unskilled workers but that effect is small and there are better remedies than curbing rights of entry.
It is a dangerous myth that Britain (even under the previous Labour Government, whose record on this issue is creditable) has open borders. Immigration restrictions on people from outside the EU are too onerous. Increased checks, higher age limits for foreign marriage partners and a more bureaucratic visa and work permits scheme do little more than cause inconvenience and in some cases misery.
Even setting aside the rights of the migrant (and we at BritCits see those as very important) - onerous immigration rules cause misery for Brits too - their families, and their children :
http://britcits.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/stories
---
Another Home Office policy concerning children found to be unlawful.
http://www.ein.org.uk/news/another-home-office-policy-concerning-children-found-be-unlawful
---
https://twitter.com/gregnotinchina tweets :
UK Landlords obliged to check immigration status - that is worse than China. Unbelievable.
---
https://twitter.com/jdportes tweets :
Queen's Speech should have been about growth & recovery. Instead it was anti-immigration. @johnvanreenen sums it up:
http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/archives/33382
John Van Reenen laments the government’s legislative plan detailed today as a missed opportunity. The focus on immigration is absurd given what the evidence shows and the speech should have been used to address our major problems, such as the failure to make long-run investments in skills, infrastructure and innovation.
---
https://twitter.com/patelsmie tweets :
Listen up #UK: #US President on #immigration- it makes us #stronger #vibrant #prosperous #dynamic
https://twitter.com/BarackObama/status/332248468523474944/photo/1
https://twitter.com/patelsmie tweets :
What’s to stop landlords passing cost of #immigration checks onto already squeezed tenants?
http://www.leftfootforward.org/2013/05/charging-tenants-for-immigration-checks/
N-o-thing!
---
https://twitter.com/DrMarkElliott tweets :
Excellent, accessible piece by @AdamWagner1 in @NewStatesman on human rights implications of proposed Immig'n Bill
http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2013/05/we-shouldnt-let-home-secretary-load-dice-over-human-rights
---
https://twitter.com/MigrantVoiceUK tweets :
Controlling immigration: the snake oil of our time
http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2013/05/controlling-immigration-snake-oil-our-time
https://twitter.com/nandosigona tweets :
2.7 million old & new #EU citizens living & working in #UK need to find a political voice to speak out against #criminalisation
---
https://twitter.com/nandosigona tweets :
UK #immigration control: children in extreme distress | openDemocracy:
http://opendemocracy.net/5050/sarah-campbell/uk-immigration-control-children-in-extreme-distress
A new study by UK charity Bail for Immigration Detainees (BID) has revealed that alarming numbers of parents are being separated from their children for the purposes of immigration control. Children suffered extreme distress, and in the majority of cases parents were eventually released from immigration detention, their detention having served no purpose at all. This raises serious questions about why they were detained in the first place.
---
https://twitter.com/nandosigona tweets :
Would like to hear https://twitter.com/MalmstromEU 's view on increasing #criminalisation of intra-EU mobility & 2.7 million #EUcitizens by the UK government
Some @britcits correspondence with @MalmstromEU in which she confirms our rights to #freemovement : http://www.scribd.com/doc/125908678/Comms-Malmstrom
'...The situation is different if a British citizen, for example, first exercises his/her right of free movement under the free movement directive and moves to another EU Member State, and subsequently returns to his/her home state. In this case the British citizen has exercised his/her EU rights and does not return to a purely internal situation. Therefore he/she can invoke his/her a right under the free movement directive to be joined or accompanied by their family members, such as their spouses, notwithstanding the nationality of these family members...'
http://britcits.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/surinder%20singh
---
Queen’s Speech immigration measures: objectionable and unworkable.
http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2013/05/queens-speech-immigration-measures-objectionable-and-unworkable
---
Cartoonist Steve Bell on the Queen's Speech.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cartoon/2013/may/08/steve-bell-on-the-queen-s-speech
---
https://twitter.com/heindehaas tweets :
Governments should stop talking about 'combating' illegal migration - this belligerent language is inappropriate
http://allafrica.com/stories/201305071094.html
---
https://twitter.com/polish_linguist tweets :
Topical. Perhaps the UK Gov might want a history lesson: A Day Without Immigrants: Making a Statement
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1189899,00.html
They may not have agreed on whether to skip school, take the day off work or refrain from all commerce today, but the hundreds of thousands of peaceful protestors who turned out in major cities across the country on Monday clearly conveyed their message that immigrants are essential to the U.S. economy and deserve the right to continue living and working here. With rallies in more than 50 cities from Las Vegas to Miami, the day of protest brought together immigrants from all walks of life and appeared to overcome early concerns that rifts within the Latino community would hamper their success.
---
Queen's Speech signals a new Immigration Bill is on its way.
http://www.migrantsrights.org.uk/blog/2013/05/queens-speech-signals-new-immigration-bill-its-way
...But by early afternoon, once again, it all appeared to have been somewhat overstated. The Queen's Speech itself was restricted to breaking the news that we can now expect a new Immigration Bill over the coming year (probably in the autumn) that will 'further reform Britain's immigration system' - with no specific reference to EU migration, welfare benefits or social housing. A Home Office briefing reports that the three main goals of the Bill will be: 'stopping immigrants accessing services they are not entitled to; making it easier to remove people from the UK and harder for people to prolong their stay with spurious appeals; and specifying that foreign nationals who commit serious crimes shall, except in extraordinary circumstances, be deported'.
---
Ending rights, supporting rights - What’s best for the future of immigration policy?
The coalition government wants less rights and less migration. Employers hint at less rights but want more migration. And others, including the European Commission, say rights are just what is needed to encourage people to migrate in security. Confused? You need not be....
http://www.migrantsrights.org.uk/blog/2013/05/ending-rights-supporting-rights-what-s-best-future-immigration-policy
---
https://twitter.com/davidpilling tweets :
How Japan got its mojo back: China and the post-tsunami spirit have revived Japan - http://FT.com http://on.ft.com/144binM
https://twitter.com/nandosigona tweets :
'A proper victim is one who looks like a journalist,' says @cmcilwain (NYU) on excellent BBC piece on #Cleveland case
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-22441124
Three young women disappeared in Cleveland. Media coverage of their cases illustrates stereotypes about race.
Charles Ramsey heard someone screaming in a nearby house. Luckily, he managed to help the woman, Amanda Berry, who was in distress.
Because of his efforts, she, Gina DeJesus and Michelle Knight escaped from the house in Cleveland where they were held captive for a decade or more.
"I knew something was wrong when a little, pretty white girl ran into a black man's arms," Ramsey said later.
"Something is wrong here. Dead giveaway."
As it turned out, Ramsey's assessment was a twist on what is known among media critics as the Missing White Woman Syndrome.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_white_woman_syndrome
---
Is Cameron's Britain what we fought for in the war?
Via https://www.facebook.com/LondonMRCF
Harry Leslie Smith is a survivor of the Great Depression, a second world war RAF veteran and at 90 an activist for the poor and for the preservation of social democracy. It is almost out of use, but very appropriate word to describe this article - wisdom!
---
All MPs, all in one place :
http://tweetminster.co.uk/mps
Via https://www.facebook.com/LondonMRCF -
@digital activists - check out what our MPs are up to on twitter
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)