By Melanie Griffiths, Sonel Mehta and Candice
Morgan-Glendinning
‘Every aspect of my life
right now is completely curtailed by the government. I can’t do anything’
British citizens are denied autonomy over decisions where to live
and establish their families when the person they fall in love with is not British
or Irish. For these citizens, the State muscles into a very private part of
their lives, whether that be through questioning the genuineness of
relationships, the stringent and conditional spousal visa rules or heartless
deportation system. Rather than treat
these citizens as rational agents able to make independent decisions about
their families, they are treated as deceptive, gullible or irresponsible, and
the motives of their partners questioned.
‘They don’t see you as people, they see
you as numbers.’
For those couples unable to meet immigration requirements or
persuade a decision maker of their need to live in the UK as a family, the ‘choices’
they are given are to live apart in different countries or to leave the UK. The
justification for this drastic infringement on citizens’ rights is the abstract
concept of the ‘public interest’. The Immigration Act 2014 brought into
statute that families do not always need to be situated in the UK. The
Immigration Directorate Instructions states that the European Convention on
Human Rights ‘does not oblige the UK
to accept the choice of a couple as to which country they would prefer to
reside in’.
New research headed by Dr Melanie
Griffiths being launched by the Universities of Bristol and Birmingham on the 8 June 2021
looks at how British citizens and their foreign national partners are faced
with this ‘choice’ of separation or relocation. Drawing on interviews with
couples and practitioners, including some BritCits members, the ‘Deportability and the Family’ project looks at the human impact of immigration
policies that have eroded Article 8 rights to respect for private and family
life.
Spousal Visas
Since 2012, spousal visas have been conditional on the British spouse
earning a steady annual income of £18,600 (increasing with each non-British
child). The sum can only be met by the British partner. It is above the minimum
wage and disproportionately affects women, young workers, retirees, black and
ethnic minorities and those living outside the more affluent south.
For those who manage to meet the income threshold, the spousal
visa process is still long, ominous and expensive, with a high evidential
burden to prove income and genuineness of relationships. Some couples spend
years submitting applications and appealing negative decisions and thousands of
pounds in applications and legal fees before securing this time-limited leave,
meaning they have to apply all over again in 2.5 years.
Many families do not have the time, money or energy to keep
battling the Home Office and end up leaving the UK so as to be together or
living separated transnationally. Long-distance relationships over two time
zones are draining and expensive, with particular impacts on children separated
from a parent. The British spouses in the research described being forced into living
as single-parent families. As a mother separated from her husband across
borders said:
‘I can’t be a wife, a mother, work, cook and clean, plus trying to figure out how I’m going to
get this money for a spousal visa.’
Removal and deportation
It is not only the spousal visa that keeps British citizens living
abroad or apart from their loved ones. Due to re-entry bans and visa
restrictions, those removed from the UK face permanent separation from their
families.
Couples need to reach extremely high legal thresholds to prove that
a partner/parent should not be deported and to prove that the family cannot live
in their country of removal. A family’s preference of where to live or standard
of education or living is not considered justification to remain. Such families
are presented the same ‘choices’ as those unable to secure spousal visas: live
in separate countries or relocate out of the UK. As a mother whose husband was
removed asked:
‘The whole family needs to move to
another country, when you could just let one person stay?!’
Photo by @angelacompagnone on Unsplash
Impact of separation
Challenging the immigration system and fighting to remain together
impacts the whole family. Living under chronic insecurity, facing separation
or relocation, with restricted access to employment and services, and high
immigration costs, leads to extreme harm to people’s private lives,
relationships, careers, finances, stability and physical and mental health. The
British partner often has to work excessive hours or multiple jobs. Those whose
partner is overseas may have to rely on expensive childcare or be forced out of
work.
British children are collateral damage in these immigration decisions.
The research included families where children had been separated from fathers
for many years, only speaking through Skype or occasional visits overseas. Most
had spent time living together, to then experience loss and separation, and
often eventual distancing. Children experienced a range of developmental,
behavioural, educational and emotional problems including depression, anxiety,
social isolation, insomnia and feeling of not belonging in the UK. As one
mother stated:
‘Yes, we’ve got WhatsApp and
Facetime, but it’s not the same as that person being there.’
A national loss
The Home Office presents decisions around family life as a choice
but this is not most people’s experience. Those living outside the UK often described
their situation as forced exile and questioned what their citizenship really
meant. All were shocked that they did not have the automatic right to live with
a partner of their choice, challenging their sense of identity and belonging.
A government focus on reducing net migration has led to a loss of
focus on the people impacted by these policies. The government must acknowledge
the benefits of inward migration and what settled and stable families bring to
society. As one of the British interviewees
said:
‘It
is really shocking to be
told that you can go and continue your family life outside of the UK. Why does
my government feel like that when I’m an asset to them?
I’ve been educated in the UK. I’m
a taxpayer. I’ve got a career.’
Since the UK left the EU, more citizens will find themselves in these
situations. More British people will be divided from the person they love or forced
to leave their community and country to live with them. As one interviewee stated:
‘If you are a British citizen then
falling in love with someone who is not British isn’t allowed to happen
basically.’
Report launch 8 June
The report from the project is being launched during an online
webinar at 4pm on 8 June 2021, in collaboration with the NGO Bail for Immigration Detainees,
chaired by Baroness Shami Chakrabarti and with speakers including Sonali Naik QC and a person directly affected by these
issues. All those who register here will be able to attend for free. The report will be also be available afterwards here.
.jpg)
