"I have never welcomed the weakening of family ties by politics or pressure" - Nelson Mandela.
"He who travels for love finds a thousand miles no longer than one" - Japanese proverb.
"Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence." - Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
"When people's love is divided by law, it is the law that needs to change". -
David Cameron.

Showing posts with label parliament. Show all posts
Showing posts with label parliament. Show all posts

Thursday, 7 December 2023

CALL TO ACTION - PROPOSED CHANGE IN MIR - URGENT 


Author/Source : Steve


The long-anticipated rise in the UK spouse and partner visa minimum income requirement has finally been announced. Around this time last year this was rumoured, and we hoped there was enough pushback to delay it. However, an increase has finally been announced and it's worse than any of us feared.

In a nutshell, the proposal is to set the MIR to £38,700 per annum - more than doubling the figure now. In 2012, when the MIR was introduced, circa 47% of the UK population would -fail- to make this income and were therefore locked out of bringing a foreign partner to the UK. As the years have passed, inflation has eroded this figure considerably, although spiralling above-inflation visa fees have locked large numbers of people out. In more than doubling the figure, well above inflation, around 73% of the UK's working population will be unable to bring in a foreign partner. 

73%! This is absolutely unjustifiable and betrays the true intention here - the proposed figure is well above that needed to support a family in the UK without relying in benefits, and the true intention is nastiness. The last roll of the dice of a failed regime, and a failed way of thinking. All the current government has left is nastiness, pettiness, making life difficult for innocent families, leaving an unpleasant legacy for the next government. Shame on them. May they be consigned to the ashcan of history.

It gets worse. It is suggested in other news reports (for example: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/foreign-spouse-visa-uk-migration-crackdown-b2459168.html ) that, defying convention and commonsense, families -already- on the route will be expected to make the new figure when they apply for extensions. One would hope that logic and intelligence would prevail here, and this proposal is nothing more than the mumblings of ignorant power-hungry politicians who do not even understand the consequences of what they propose. But let's see. One cannot take anything for granted.

I am therefore CALLING EVERYONE IMPACTED, their FRIENDS, FAMILIES and ALLIES, to URGENTLY contact their MPs, parliamentary candidates, and other civil society representatives such as trade unions and faith groups to oppose this egregious proposal and make it clear that ANY POLITICIAN who supports this will be wiped out come the next election. Too often in recent years our interests - the interests of British citizens and their families - have been ignored or gaslighted in the interests of 'listening to concerns'. Enough is enough. THIS MUST NOT HAPPEN and any politician supporting it needs to be wiped from the electoral map.

You can identify and write to your local MP using these tools - https://www.writetothem.com/ or https://members.parliament.uk/members/commons or https://www.theyworkforyou.com/

Labour candidates for the next election where chosen can be found using this tool when available - https://vote.labour.org.uk/


We expect Greens will share their candidates here - https://www.greenparty.org.uk/find-your-local-party.html

We also encourage people to share with trade unions they belong to.

As the recent RMT campaign to save ticket offices - successfully - shows, enough outrage CAN make a difference. Please! 

This is just a template - please do feel free to modify with your own story!

Template letter below :
----

Dear <candidate name>,

As a voter in the constituency you want to represent in Parliament, I am writing to you with what I want you and any future Government to address in creating a fair immigration policy, and to raise grave concerns over the direction of family migration policy.

Since 2012, many reforms have been introduced creating a 'hostile environment' towards those who come here from overseas. This includes not only migrants - but also British people with overseas families - spouses, partners, children, dependant relatives. I believe the vast majority of people who come to the UK want to actively take part in their local communities, and contribute to wider British society. Current immigration policies are undermining their ability to feel welcome and are increasing social divisions.

In particular, I want to highlight the rules around spousal/partner/family visas which have caused division for many UK families.
- The minimum income requirement, introduced in 2012, was set far higher than the vast majority of developed nations, at a level which close to 40% of the UK population - higher among women and in many regions - could not hope to meet. This has caused many people to have to choose between exile or family division.
- This has also caused untold mental health and financial harm to thousands of families - including small children at vulnerable points in their lives - as they struggle to meet the requirement.
- As well as family impact, contrary to stated reasoning that they promote integration and the economy, the legacy of these rules is of family division - and of in fact harming the economy through forcing people into single parenthood and denying the economy hardpaying workers and taxpayers who will support their families and the country as a whole.
- As well as this, partner visa fees have spiralled since 2012 - the cost for the whole process, not including legal fees, approach £15,000 - £20,000 - prohibitively expensive, far more than most people can afford! All in support of a policy which just divides families, harming society and the economy.
- Furthermore, I would like to highlight that family policies around adult dependant relatives are nearly impossible to meet regardless - a ban masquerading as a rule - the impact on families is truly multi-generational.

<those impacted may want to include a bit about their stories here>

Now I am shocked and appalled that is now a proposal to set the figure of the partner visa minimum income requirement to circa £38,700 per year. This would prevent around 73% of the UK working population from falling in love with a foreigner and starting a family. This is shocking and defies all justification. Even following the logic of the 2012 rule change where supposedly the MIR was set to prevent dependence on benefits, this is far far above the figure needed by the vast majority of the country to support a family. It's absolutely unjustifiable and carries no logic whatsoever, except sheer nastiness.

Furthermore, it's also suggested in the media - by the Home Secretary himself - that the rug may figuratively pulled from under such families as are already on the route by forcing them to conform to the much higher figure when it comes to renewal. This in particular shows a low level of 'bait and switch' morality, and the proposal to break up families in this way is absolutely immoral. Not only immoral, but stupid - how on earth would the country benefit by forcing hard workers to leave and forcing people into single parenthood and benefits? 

I suspect this is the last roll of the dice of a failed mentality. It must be stopped. As one family quoted in the London Evening Standard this week stated, it is nothing less than an obscenity. 

As a nation, our history of tolerance, openness and compassion is being undermined by the politics of fear and division. I want to see an end to arbitrary and short-sighted immigration policies that feed into the creation of an unwelcoming environment for families and ultimately are unsustainable.

I urge you to strongly oppose these measures. I will urge my friends and family to vote out any politician who gives any hint of supporting this unacceptable, immoral, and self-destructive policy. I will be working to identify all parliamentary candidates in my constituency and urging them to make a commitment. This will help decide how I vote in the election in the next few months. I will do all in my power using my democratic rights to spread the word and push for this abominable proposal to be ditched and wiped from history. I truly hope that the politics of compassion - indeed, basic logic - prevail, and that the politics of division are consigned to the ashcan of history.

Please use your office to strongly oppose these egregious measures, on behalf of your constituents, your country, and all that is good.
And please use your office to support those suffering from these unjustified and truly immoral policies.

Yours sincerely,

<name>

.

Sunday, 30 October 2022

House of Lords Justice and Home Affairs Committee


Many thanks to our friend Rebecca for appearing in front of the House of Lords Justice and Home Affairs Committee. This was part of the family migration inquiry which BritCits helped to contribute to via the University of Sheffield's Centre for Care. We are happy to be working with Sheffield and were grateful to facilitate a representation based on the request from the Lords.

All three witnesses gave compelling and moving testimony as to the impact of the family migration rules on their families, in different ways - across generations.

You can watch the session here. And a transcript will be available in due course.

(Our trustee, Steve, was also present - but you can't see him because he's off camera :) ). 

(Our friend, Ella of the group Reunite Families UK, also contributed to this inquiry and you can read a piece on that here). 



Updated 8/Nov/2022 : The transcript is available here. 



Tuesday, 17 November 2020

Living Online and Covid Impact Report

Over the last few weeks, Reunite Families UK has conducted two online surveys ( here + here ) in response to two ongoing parliamentary inquiries: ‘Living online: the long-term impact on wellbeing’ (House of Lords Covid-19 Committee) and ‘Covid:lessons learnt’ (Health and Social Care Committee/Science and Technology Committee) with a view to creating a report to these inquiries.

The spouse visa minimum income requirement was introduced in 2012 and has resulted in the enforced division of thousands of British citizens from their non-EEA partners and families, either temporarily or indefinitely. This group of people – including members of Facebook groups such as Reunite Families UK and I Love My Foreign Spouse – have therefore anticipated in many cases the family division created by the pandemic, with many such relationships conducted largely online for months or years (the average family or partner separation time ranges from 3 months to 3 years, with some experiencing division for more than 5 years) and therefore this group of people have a special insight into how families divided might play out.

The report is here : https://www.scribd.com/document/484534378/RFUK-Living-Online-and-Covid-Impact-Report-sg, which includes the summary results of each survey (with numbers/data around the responses), plus some of the individual responses (left in comments sections of the surveys), and conclusions and policy and operational recommendations we think should be drawn as a result of these surveys, the 2012 rules, the pandemic and the future.

I hope you find it interesting – I found it both fascinating and moving, and interesting to try to quantify some of the impacts of the immigration rules on British families, which are as you may expect devastating for most of those who responded.

Many thanks to all those who participated as a result of the calls on social media. The report has been uploaded to the relevant inquiries. All identifying information has been removed.

Sunday, 13 September 2015

Evidence that the Government is Failing British Families


Family Friendly?
The impact on children of the Family Migration Rules: A review of the financial requirements by the Children's Commissioner was launched on Wednesday.

Author : Mark Stokes Source :The Children's Commissioner/JCWI/Middlesex University/Divided Families et al Report


On Wednesday we saw a large turn out at Parliament for the launch of the Children's Commissioner's report into the impact of the family migration rules that were introduced in July 2012. 
The Boothroyd room was packed with families and those impacted by the rules.

In recent weeks serious questions are now being asked about the humanitarian face of immigration control both in the press and in Parliament. Compared with previous meetings this meeting had a very different feeling about it due to the wider debate of how we should treat migrants now happening in society in general. It was as if people suddenly had learned to listen and were now not afraid to support positive changes instead of just offering empty political gesturing . 

Despite many of the panel attending other events and previously hearing of the problems and the suffering that many British families with non-Eu partners faced under the new rules, they looked genuinely shocked at what they were reading and were moved by the personal accounts contained in the report.


Some of the more memorable comments from the panel were:-


"We have seen the rejection of the Little England approach to immigration over the last couple of weeks"

"Families are meant to be the bedrock of society"

"The minimum income rule discriminates and does not reflect the contributions the families make"

The general consensus of the panel of speakers was that the rules need to change and this is some of the evidence that is needed to help that happen. Which was summed up by them saying:-  
"the report tells a powerful story with strong imagery that should lead to change"

Some of the key findings contained within the report were:-


  • "…..at least 15,000 children have been affected by changes.
  • Children, most of whom are British citizens. are suffering distress and anxiety as a result of separation from a parent….
  • The financial requirements affect British citizens….who have started families with foreigners from outside the European Economic Area (EEA) and who wish to live in the UK. 
  • The income level would not be met by almost half the adult population…
  • ...many families with children may never be able to meet them. 
  • The financial requirements are inflexible.    
  • The threshold is too high and is discriminatory.
  • British citizens who have lived and worked abroad and formed long-term relationships abroad are particularly penalised and find it very difficult to return to the UK.
  • The financial requirements do not meet their stated policy aims………The Immigration Rules and accompanying guidance do not comply with the duty to safeguard and protect the best interests of all children in the UK. 
  • …the Rules as drafted breach national and international law. 
  • ...decision letters are often legally and factually incorrect. 
  • In relative terms, the UK income threshold is the highest in the world and is the second highest in absolute terms. 
  • Applications are expensive and difficult to make. This report calculates that the total costs for a single applicant to move from application to settlement are likely to exceed £6,000. 
  • Applicants who cannot meet the financial requirements are refused visitor visas and cannot be with their children and partners for even short periods of time. 
  • It is not only an immigration question but engages the fundamental rights of British citizens….. 
  • In a small number of cases, respondents mentioned that the emotional and psychological strain of the separation had caused irreversible damage to the relationship with their partner."

"British citizens may also form relationships with those they met on holiday or during gap years, internships, study abroad schemes or similar. Global travel is now a normal part of life for many people including those of modest means, who may nevertheless be well educated (66% of the sample had degrees or equivalent qualifications). They do not understand why they cannot exercise what seems to them to be a straightforward right: to establish their family life in their own home country."

"This report concludes that the financial requirements do not strike the right balance and breach Article 8 ECHR"

Where to get a copy of the report?

The full pdf of the report can be downloaded from JCWI's web site using the following link or from the Children Commissioner's website using the following link

Based on the report a smaller discussion paper of 8 pages was also produced called 'Skype Families' it also can be downloaded by using the following link

Now we have this report with its damming evidence make sure your MP knows about this report and gets to read it. The more MP's that know about this the harder it will be for them to ignore the evidence.

Will the rules now change?

We do not know if, when or how the rules will change but the evidence and recommendations in this report will add to the growing pressure for change that can not be ignored. It is most probable that we may have to wait for the new immigration bill or the conclusion of the MM case in the Supreme Court before changes happen. Both of those are now only months away.

Some news articles and coverage about the Launch and the Report

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/sep/09/immigration-income-threshold-creates-thousands-of-skype-kids-says-report

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-34191606

http://www.politics.co.uk/blogs/2015/09/09/how-immigration-policy-brutalises-british-children

https://home.bt.com/news/uk-news/rules-on-foreign-spouses-creating-skype-families-childrens-commissioner-says-11364002627292

http://www.mdx.ac.uk/news/2015/09/occ-report-reveals-hardships-faced-by-skype-families

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/strict-immigration-rules-drive-families-apart-by-separating-british-children-from-their-parents-10492226.html

http://www.bailiwickexpress.com/jsy/life/current-affairs/theres-now-15000-children-skype-families-who-only-see-one-parent-screen/

http://www.ein.org.uk/news/childrens-commissioner-family-migration-rules-separate-15000-children-parent

http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/news/national/rules-on-foreign-spouses-creating-skype-families-children-s-commissioner-says-1-6947437

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/09/09/immigration-rules-uk-skype-families_n_8108458.html

http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2015/09/09/428470/UK-migration-rules-separating-families-

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/uk/UK-seeing-a-generation-of-migrant-children-growing-up-in-Skype-families/articleshow/48890557.cms

https://www.politicshome.com/home-affairs/articles/story/uks-immigration-rules-creating-skype-families

http://www.newasianpost.com/new-immigration-controls-impact-thousands-of-british-children/

http://www.buzzfeed.com/jamesball/15000-children-are-living-without-one-of-their-parents-becau

http://ukasiaonline.com/separation-how-the-coalition-s-visa-rules-have-created-thousands-of-skype-families.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/pa/article-3227308/Rules-foreign-spouses-creating-Skype-families-Childrens-Commissioner-says.html


Thursday, 16 April 2015

Write to your future MP


Migrant Rights Network's Our Vote campaign is urging voters to write to their candidates to ask for fairness and justice in immigration: to protect the right to family life, end mass detention, end the 'hostile environment', and more.

The rather excellent online tool locates local parliamentary candidates who have an email address recorded and lets you contact them.

In the interests of all the families that have been divided and harried over the last parliament, I urge you to make your voice heard and get commitments from your candidates - by using this link :

http://www.our-vote.org/write-to-your-next-MP

Tuesday, 24 February 2015

Tory candidate for Walsall wants your views on immigration

Douglas Hansen-Luke and immigration

Parliamentary candidate for Walsall, Douglas Hansen-Luke, posted a photo on Facebook, lauding the wonderful things with immigration his party has done.   He no doubt did not expect the reaction he did receive, from British citizens impacted by the rules, and his replies to those who told him how let down they felt by the government, show he's likely been seduced by Tory propaganda. 

Please help him see the light and tell him what you think by posting on the  original FP post
Or in the revised one Douglas put up to detract attention from the original one, here
And in case the posts are 'accidentally deleted', see this

"My understanding is that if you're contributing and can completely support yourselves then spouses can take partners in to Britain"

Douglas shows a lack of understanding that even those earning very high salaries are forced to spend 8 to 18 months apart from their partner in order to satsify the rules.


"You've married a non-Brit and don't have the funds to support your partner. Instead you'd like other tax-payers to that for you. If that's the case then I'm afraid that I'm not on your side. If that's not the case then by all means put me right."

Douglas shows a lack of understanding of 'no recourse to public funds' which means non-EEA citizens - albeit married to British citizens - cannot access benefits.  At no point did any of the posters suggest taxpayers should pay for their spouse to live in the UK.

Then, there was this: 

"Let's be very clear immigration is a good thing. It enriches our country and if done well allows us to grow and support those already here. What is not sensible is letting in non-Brits and supporting them when we are going deeper in to debt each day just meeting current obligations. Is it fair that current tax payer have to pay for that or that those who have paid in all their lives have to accept reduce services because of increased demand?

I am the child of immigrants. Both my parents worked in the NHS. I understand the case for immigration, I don't understand the case for putting non-Brits before our own people.

And now to address the pain of those who have commented so far. I am sure that the current system is not perfect and I'm sure that we don't always get it right. And when we do, your voice is heard. Our country is far more tolerant than most. If fair play is what's needed and your cause is just then I would be happy to support you and I'm sure all politicians would be too no matter their party."


Update - 12th March 2015

Power of the people shown when Tory candidate, Douglas Hansen-Luke further to the volume of replies, requested a meeting with BritCits, taking place as an hour long phone call.

Douglas admitted knowing very little about family immigration rules - despite the fact that he has a foreign wife.  He was very surpised to know that had his wife's spouse visa application been made post 2012 rather than in 2005, they would have had to spend time apart and it may not have been feasible for them to relocate to the UK.  He asked for me to explain to him what the rules are and I was able to share the experiences that many of you have had as examples. 

He was not aware
- that even those who earn over the threshold have to still spend 12-18 months apart from their spouse (because of the evidential requirements)
- of the issues faced by those with a Prohibited Steps Order in place
- of the ELT being needed pre entry into the country
- of the inflexibility in the rules in taking into account income and expenditure (e.g. if own home, no rent or mortgage costs should mean lower income required)...
- ADR rules slamming the door shut on elderly relatives.
- the probationary period having been increased from 2 years to 5 years

....essentially lots he wasnt aware of.
On the face of it, he agreed with us, stating the policy is 'not sensible' and "un-British" and not in keeping with the family friendly view he had of his own party, a view which is welcome and certainly places Douglas in company with a handful of decent already elected politicians.

Douglas wants to hear from people in the Walsall region - so pls do contact him on facebook or through his email: douglas@workingforwalsall.com and let him know what you think of the Tory family immigration rules and what change you want to see. He was surprised to hear that Tories, amongst our membership at least, had lost a lot of support because of these rules, as a surprising number of us live in what were formerly safe Tory seats.
What did he say he will do? 
1) likely ask around to see if what I have told him is right - which we know it is

2) "When" he is elected as MP (he seemed very confident), will vote the right way when it comes to amending the rules.  Currently difficult to depart from the standard Tory party line because he is in a very closely contested seat.  But he would need to see that his constituents want change - so this comes from you guys living in the area - or indeed, in any area, raising this with the candidates standing for the seat come this election.

3) Might make a statement on Facebook - feel free to follow up with him asking for that, either on Facebook, email address or twitter: @DHansenLuke

4) Agreed that when he makes statements praising the Tory immigration policy (incidentally he is not a fan of the Tories treatment of international students either!) he will not conflate this with their policy on family immigration

5)  Come out publicly about his own experience of the immigration rules and the points we have discussed, once elected.

Thursday, 29 January 2015

Liberal Democrats and family immigration

As we head closer to the General Election, BritCits last week approached all the major parties (and many of the  major minor ones) for their commitment, pledge, policy - call it what you like - on immigration, especially family immigration.  Our write-up on Labour's proposal can be found here.  We are still awaiting for a response from Labour on how they intend to review the rules for elderly relatives, on which they have recently, sadly, been silent.  However we remain positive that a response is forthcoming.

In this post we include a response written exclusively for BritCits by Julian Huppert, MP for Cambridge, and his fantastic team, on behalf of the Liberal Democrats, to whom we extend our sincere gratitude.  In all our dealings, I have found them to be prompt, fair and straightforward - personal opinion of course, but there are too many politicians out there, including my own MP, who could learn a thing or two from Julian and his team, on what working for the people really entails. 

However, the aim of these posts is not to provide parties with a platform to bash each other, as frankly, none of the three major parties is blameless for the mess that is UK family immigration rules.  The rules were brought in by a Conservative-Lib Dem coalition, unhindered by Labour, on 9 July 2012, with less than a month's notice.  Since then, the UKIP hate-vortex has whipped those who prefer to be blindly led into an unfounded frenzy, just to promote an anti-EU agenda.

Politicians should be urged to remember their job is not only to represent voters, but that they have a professional and moral obligation to present us with facts, not convenient political spin, half-truths and sometimes blatant lies.  In any other profession, such behaviour would be met with disqualification, financial penalties and loss of job!  Staying silent in the face of the public being led astray for fear of public recrimination is almost as bad. 

Until recently, no party has steadfastly held up the pro-family flag where it involves the dirty 'i' word, 'immigration'.  The devastation wreaked on families because of the rules and how they are applied is well documented on our site, by other organisations and the media, and even in the MM case, at the Court of Appeal last March. 

It is thus heartening to see Lib Dem acknowledging the income threshold for sponsorship of a partner is too high.  More from them on what level of threshold, in any, would be fair is welcome, other changes in the application of the rules, as well as commentary on the requirement for foreign partners from select countries to achieve a certain level in the English language.  Would the best place to learn English not be surrounded by those who speak it, with the support of your British partner and children?

The Lib Dem proposal to review the rules for elderly/adult dependant relatives is particularly welcomed and much needed.  I'm not sure whether even Julian understands what a farce the ADR rules are, with the British Medical Association stating that we are losing NHS-trained doctors to countries like Canada and Singapore with family friendly immigration policies.

The super visa proposed by Lib Dems to replicate the Canadian system is a fantastic addition, and would meet the requirements of many elderly relatives who do not wish to settle in the UK, but do not want to be constrained to six months.

Julian's response is included below unedited - save for my putting in bold the sections relating to family immigration: 

“Immigration has massively benefited the UK. We are richer, culturally and economically, as a result of those who migrate to study, work and play in our country. More fundamentally even, we are a nation of immigrants – migrants have come to our country over centuries, and we should embrace this heritage as an essential part of our national identity.
 
In today’s political climate, it is deeply unfortunate that my party seems to be the only one willing to stand up for migrants and their rights. The Tories are running scared of UKIP – that is why they increasingly scaremonger and talk about getting ‘tough on immigration’, which massively ignores the fact that migration benefits us all. Their proposal to introduce a net migration target below 100,000 was absurd. That is why we told the Tories it would never form part of the coalition agreement.
 
Labour are sadly also following that race to the bottom, boasting about their ‘tough new approach on immigration’. They know how toxic that is to many of their supporters, and perhaps that is why briefings from their party headquarters tell candidates they should “avoid talking about immigration”. It was left to us to take on UKIP last May, with Nick Clegg the only party leader prepared to challenge the xenophobic message coming from Nigel Farage.
 
I am proud my party stands up for and will continue to stand up for the rights of immigrants. But to do this, we need to have a competent system that allows us to know who is here and who isn’t, and that can deal competently with visa applications. The failures of the Home Office, then UKBA, have understandably led to a catastrophic loss of trust in the system, and that is partly responsible for the current toxic level of debate. Labour scrapped exit checks, so we had no idea who had stayed in the country illegally, and who had left as they said they intended to. We are working on reintroducing those checks, so our policies can be based on actual evidence of what is happening.
 
Partly because of this chaos, Labour let too many people come in illegally. They made it hard for people to get here legally, and treated many asylum seekers very badly, but they did far less about those who were prepared to break the law to get here. I’m pleased we’ve closed down serious loopholes, such as the bogus colleges that were operating. We should encourage and support legal migration, not encourage people to behave illegally.
 
And we should treat people decently when they are here. Labour detained huge numbers of children for immigration purposes at the infamous Yarl’s Wood Family Unit - 7,000 children in their last 5 years, for months on end in some cases. Thanks to Lib Dem pressure, that is no longer the case. However, we still have too many elements of the inhuman ways people were treated - such as the Azure card scheme, which forces vulnerable people to buy essential goods from only a select few shops and the ban on asylum seekers working, even if they have been waiting over 6 months for a response from the Home Office. We should want these people, many of whom are very skilled, to work, and we should expect them to seek work.
 
As I wrote at the beginning, the benefits of immigration wholly outweigh the costs and, frankly, we need migrants. Without them, we’d be short of doctors and nurses, business experts and investors, just to name a few. 1 in 7 companies were set up by immigrants, employing huge numbers of people.
 
As Liberal Democrats, we firmly believe in the right to family life. Unfortunately there are many migrants in the UK who are separated from their loved ones. This causes a lot of misery and pain – our aim should be to allow family union wherever possible whilst also ensuring the system is watertight to abuse.
 
Changes to rules meant that people needed an income of £18,600 to bring a family member in (more with children), and this has caused too much anguish. We think that figure has to be revisited. Indeed, given that 47% of the UK population would fail to meet this threshold, it can hardly be reasonable to expect migrants to meet it, especially when the income from the migrant isn’t counted. That is why we are calling for the Migration Advisory Committee to re-consider the income tax threshold level.
 
Over a number of years, rules have also been tightened on elderly dependent relatives coming to the UK. Now the rules are so tight that elderly dependent relatives can only come to our country if they aren’t able at all to receive care in their home country. This goes too far. As long as elderly relatives can be supported by their family members and will not be a drain on the NHS, they should be able to come to this country. This sets the right balance between helping divided families come together and not overburdening the taxpayer.
 
There are also very serious problems with short-term visits. The Home Office are often far too slow-moving in granting visas – families who want to unite to meet for occasions like weddings and funerals often face unnecessary frustrations. This must change. To improve speed of decisions, we want to use a new system developed in Croydon and roll it out nationally. In Croydon, a face to face visa application service using a PEO model has proved itself to be very efficient. Decisions also need to be better quality. Hence why we are proposing new standards for immigration officers who should be recruited as skilled professionals rather than as administrators. Finally, we want improved training programmes for them.
 
A final Lib Dem proposal is our grandparents’ “super visa”. One problem we currently have is that foreign grandparents can’t visit their families for long periods of time. Canada has introduced an extended tourist visa for people in those circumstances. Liberal Democrats want to follow lead by making changes to introducing a grandparents’ super visa, allowing grandparents to visit for up to 2 years on condition of an actuarially-calculated health levy.
 
Liberal Democrats are the party that will stand up for migrants. We have done very important work to tighten up on problems which Labour left us with. But we know much more needs to be done to help divided families. Migrants come here to contribute and help all of us – but the system at present is letting many down by not allowing them to unite with relatives. If we are in coalition again, we will fight to do everything we can to overcome this. We are the only party that wants to and can deliver for migrants.”

Julian Huppert, MP for Cambridge

Wednesday, 21 January 2015

Labour and family immigration

“Our intention is clear – we will reform the system because the current rules aren’t right.” – Office of David HansonMP, Shadow Immigration Minister, Labour Party


On 9th July 2014, as part of a discussion of UK’s Adult Dependant Relative rules, David Hanson MP Shadow Immigration Minister, confirmed that come 8th May, if Labour is in government, and if he is Immigration Minister, he will immediately launch a review of the family immigration rules.  Although there was no mention of what they would be changed to, and there were too many ifs for my liking, this was still a big step forward given it was made as a public statement from a frontbench politician of one of UK’s main parties. 


In January 2015 I followed up with David and his office in order to get more clarification.  David, in his position as Labour spokesperson with the decision making power on Labour’s immigration policy has confirmed that if elected to government I will be undertaking a review of the spousal rules as I confirm they are unfair and we wish to change them. Only a Labour government will do this as the current Coalition support the rules and no other party will be able to form an alternative government in May”.   (We have asked David for Labour's view of the ADR rules as well, and will update readers once we have a response.)


This is in line with what David has been saying to me since my first meeting with him; that in his view UK’s family immigration rules are unfair and unjust, hence his working with others in the Labour party to making a pledge to change these rules.  

The commitment to change the family immigration rules, at least as they impact British citizens and residents with a non-EEA partner, is no longer contingent on David being Immigration Minister. It is a party pledge, with the purpose of the review not to see whether the rules should change – they are clear that the rules must be changed - but rather to assess what a reformed set of rules and systems, to bring about fairness to families, would look like.    

Some readers may suggest why not just revert to the pre 9 July 2012 rules.  Others will express cynicism as to whether this is just another hollow promise.  Politicians after all don't have a great track record in following through on their promises - just compare the 2010 election manifestos to how families have actually been treated under this government, despite all parties claiming families were the 'bedrock of society'.  Labour is not blameless either.  As Opposition, they did not even put up a fight against these rules in 2012.

However, having liaised with David and his office for about a year now I have some faith that in David perhaps we're seeing a politician as they should be.  He comes across as genuine and caring.  Having grown up in an extended family, where grandparents, aunts, uncles formed part of the same household, David appears to understand the need for kids to have both their parents; the value grandparents bring to the lives of young ones; and that family is not always just a nuclear unit.  We hope David's commitment to families remains as firm if he is in government, as it is as the opposition.

Note: BritCits has approached all the main political parties to garner their views on family immigration.  Watch this space!

Below is a copy of the email sent by the Labour Frontbench to one of our members.

From: Frontbench <frontbench@labour.org.uk>
Date: Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 5:10 PM
Subject: Response from the Labour Party

Thank you for your email from December regarding spousal visas. We appreciate you taking the time to contact us, and apologise for the delay in responding.



At a time when our national finances are hard-stretched, it is only fair that anyone wanting to bring someone new to this country should be able to prove that they can provide for themselves, and not be a burden on the state. But Labour is concerned that the Government’s policy, of requiring an income upwards of £18,600 before a spouse or dependent can move to Britain, will not achieve what it hopes. We are also worried that the Government have rejected other options that could be fairer for families and provide better protection for the taxpayer.



We are living in an increasingly globalised world, where more and more people are travelling abroad and developing relationships across borders. There is a danger that the Government’s policy could be unfair on people with modest incomes who genuinely fall in love overseas, perhaps with someone whose income does not meet the Government’s criteria. And in the current climate, even someone earning £40,000 today could find themselves out of work and earning nothing tomorrow, so simply relying on income as a guarantee may be a mistake that can still leave the taxpayer exposed.



That’s why there might be other ways of doing it, such as considering the income of the person who is entering as well as the person who is already in Britain. Or, it might be fairer and more effective to insist that anyone sponsoring a partner to come to this country should deposit a financial bond that could be used to meet any unforeseen costs, and which would be redeemable after a fixed period. Yet the Government didn’t even consult on this option.  A Labour Government will review the changes to the spousal visa system.



The system for legal migration needs to be much more effective. For example, huge delays for visitor visas mean that British families’ overseas relatives end up missing weddings and funerals. And we know the quality of decision making on family visitor visas is simply not good enough, as almost half of the decisions are overturned on appeal. That is why Labour opposes the Government’s plans to abolish the appeals process for family visitor visas.



The Government’s net migration target isn’t targeting the right things, and illegal immigration is getting worse as a result, with fewer people stopped, more absconding, fewer deported and backlogs of cases not pursued. There needs to be a mature recognition that there are different kinds of immigration – some types that work for both migrants and for Britain, and some that do not. Labour will not engage in an arms race on immigration rhetoric, or pander to prejudice or populism. We want a sensible debate on policies to make sure immigration works for all.



Labour have a progressive and fair approach to immigration, based on fairness and contribution. You can read more about Labour’s plan for Britain’s future in our Changing Britain Together booklet.



Thank you again for taking the time to contact us.



With kind regards,


On behalf of the Labour Party
 

Wednesday, 1 October 2014

'Henry is being removed to Nigeria today.He hasn't been there for 31 yrs. He leaves behind his British wife & children.'


Via https://twitter.com/Heather_Jones5/status/517250357039476736

'Too many laws, not enough justice – voice from Haslar' - http://unlocked.org.uk/blog/too-many-laws-not-enough-justice-voice-from-haslar/

There's still time to submit a statement to the All Party Parliamentary Group on Migration's Detention Inquiry - http://detentionforum.org.uk/detention-inquiry-2/

Deadline today!

Thursday, 4 September 2014

Are you affected by the UK's family division rules?

Do you have children?

Please make your voice heard! Contribute to the Children's Commissioner's survey.
The Office of the Children's Commissioners is following up on the concerns and issues by all of the campaigning over the last couple of years.

The OCC is conducting research on the impact of the rules on children with a view to, in the Children's Commissioner for England's words, 'achieve a just settlement for families who are, or who will be, divided by the implementation of these rules.'

If you're affected by family migration rules, have children, and have a few moments, please complete the survey :
http://www.scribd.com/doc/235449747/Children-s-Commissioner-Questionnaire
or here :
http://family.migrantsrights.org.uk/news/2014/office-childrens-commissioner-seeks-evidence-those-affected-family-migration-rules
or here :
http://www.jcwi.org.uk/blog/2014/08/01/childrens-commissioner-investigates-family-migration-rules

Blog post :
http://britcits.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/childrens-commissioner-questionnaire.html

Full instructions on where to send the survey to - as well as a letter from the Children's Commissioner for England herself, and interesting reading on the background to this and the work of the OCC - are in the links above.

* The Children's Commissioners for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are the voice of the child in government. They have spoken out on the issue before, and wish to follow this up further. Please help them achieve this.

The Children's Commissioners' briefing on the APPG on Migration 'Report of the Inquiry into the New Family Migration Rules' is both excellent and devastating. Read it here :

http://www.childrenscommissioner.gov.uk/content/publications/content_671

Monday, 1 September 2014

*** IMPORTANT - The Children's Commissioner survey is now open until 15th September


If you have children, and are affected by the UK's immigration rules, please please please complete the survey :

http://www.scribd.com/doc/235449747/Children-s-Commissioner-Questionnaire

The Office of the Children's Commissioner is conducting research on the impact of the rules on children with a view to, in the Children's Commissioner for England's words, 'achieve a just settlement for families who are, or who will be, divided by the implementation of these rules.'

Full instructions on where to send the survey to, as well as a letter from the Children's Commissioner for England herself, are in the link above.

* The Children's Commissioners for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are the voice of the child in government. They have spoken out on the issue before, and wish to follow this up further. Please help them achieve this.

Children's Commissioners' briefing on the APPG on Migration 'Report of the Inquiry into the New Family Migration Rules' : http://www.childrenscommissioner.gov.uk/content/publications/content_671 


Previous post : http://britcits.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/childrens-commissioner-questionnaire.html



Monday, 18 August 2014

*** Important repost *** 

Have your say : Reminder to those affected by family migration rules with children

http://britcits.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/childrens-commissioner-questionnaire.html

As previously mentioned, the Office of the Children's Commissioners is following up on the concerns and issues by all of the campaigning over the last couple of years.

The OCC is conducting research on the impact of the rules on children with a view to, in the Children's Commissioner for England's words, 'achieve a just settlement for families who are, or who will be, divided by the implementation of these rules.'

If you're affected by family migration rules, have children, and have a few moments, please complete the survey here :
http://www.scribd.com/doc/235449747/Children-s-Commissioner-Questionnaire

Full instructions on where to send the survey to, as well as a letter from the Children's Commissioner for England herself, are in the link above.

* The Children's Commissioners for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are the voice of the child in government. They have spoken out on the issue before, and wish to follow this up further. Please help them achieve this.

Children's Commissioners' briefing on the APPG on Migration 'Report of the Inquiry into the New Family Migration Rules' : http://www.childrenscommissioner.gov.uk/content/publications/content_671

Thursday, 31 July 2014

Children's Commissioner Questionnaire - have your say!

Source : Children's Commissioner

As previously mentioned, the Office of the Children's Commissioners is following up on the concerns and issues by all of the campaigning over the last couple of years.

The OCC is conducting research on the impact of the rules on children with a view to, in the Children's Commissioner for England's words, 'achieve a just settlement for families who are, or who will be, divided by the implementation of these rules.'

If you're affected by family migration rules, have children, and have a few moments, please complete the survey here :
http://www.scribd.com/doc/235449747/Children-s-Commissioner-Questionnaire

Full instructions on where to send the survey to, as well as a letter from the Children's Commissioner for England herself, are in the link above.

* The Children's Commissioners for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are the voice of the child in government. They have spoken out on the issue before, and wish to follow this up further. Please help them achieve this.

Children's Commissioners' briefing on the APPG on Migration 'Report of the Inquiry into the New Family Migration Rules' : http://www.childrenscommissioner.gov.uk/content/publications/content_671

Thursday, 24 July 2014

More Photos from the 2 years on day of action


Two years on and we are still fighting for our rights
We take the fight to Parliament


BritCits Goes to Parliament for the APPG on Migration

The APPG on Migration gets under way

Lord Teverson, Liberal Democrats with Ryan Shorthouse of  Bright Blue listening
 
Andrew Percy MP, Conservative 
The panel are told Gary has a problem

Andrew Percy MP, talks about Gary



BritCits Goes to The Home Office to Protest


The protestors gather outside the Home Office


Gathered crowd are told of the heart ache of a grandmother

Many Families Wish the Home Secretary is Listening

Family Life is a Fundamental Right

Lee Jasper speaks out against the Xenophobia of the Government

Ninja's fight for their families

People's experiences are told

Listening to the Horrors caused by the Home Office


The discrimination of the Government against it's own Citizens has to Stop! 

Divided Families

A member of the Clergy from Walthamstow speaks out 

Many communities impacted

A couple under threat 
Migrants are the life blood of the UK

An angry mob sick of immigrants being blamed for everything

Making sure Home Office workers get the message

Any grants or funding for further research into the impacts would be most welcome

Many immigrants are family members of British families

The angry protestors chant so the Home Office Workers can hear

Immigrants will not give up their families


Family life is a Right

BritCits returns to Parliament for the launch of the report on family dependents


Setting up of the Committee Room in the House of Commons


David Hanson, MP ,Labour shadow immigration minister, gives Labour's commitment to review the family migration rules as soon as they are in power.

Sonel Mehta talks about the joint report on family dependents

Sarah Teather MP Hosts the evening 
The panel answer individual questions at the end


The event comes to a close and conversation are moved to another venue
After a long day the conversations continue