"I have never welcomed the weakening of family ties by politics or pressure" - Nelson Mandela.
"He who travels for love finds a thousand miles no longer than one" - Japanese proverb.
"Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence." - Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
"When people's love is divided by law, it is the law that needs to change". -
David Cameron.

Showing posts with label mary carpenter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mary carpenter. Show all posts

Saturday, 25 October 2014

Free movement - references to some key court rulings


Here is a summary of some useful case law and other official documentation which could prove useful to those interested in exercising free movement rights.   Reliance on case law should not be blind as it is not necessarily all that is needed to establish rights.  It may not be appropriate for your situation and showing off how much more you know than the caseworker by OD’ing on case law references is likely to piss them off.  Pride is a strange thing! 
Furthermore, Home Office is notoriously slow in updating UK regulations to reflect recent court decisions it is not happy with.  Sadly, it is also not unknown for the Home Office to adopt the most restrictive interpretation possible, leaving it to another case years down the line, to shed clarity or hold the department accountable. 

There are sometimes inconsistencies between judgments where the more recent judgment could ‘trump’ an earlier one, or provide clarification. 

The key message is based on my understanding.  Links are provided so readers can form their own opinions and as always, when in any doubt, you are strongly advised to seek specialist immigration advice.  

Please send any suggestions and corrections (much welcomed) to BritCits@gmail.com

Thursday, 16 October 2014

Is UK handling of EEA Family Permit visas still a problem?
Source : EU Movement blog

http://eumovement.wordpress.com/2014/08/07/is-uk-handling-of-eea-family-permit-visas-still-a-problem/

Quotes :
'In the past, British embassy handling of EEA Family Permit visas has systematically violated EU Law, even in the straight forward cases. The problems are detailed in the Oct 2012 complaint to the European Commission CHAP(2012)3146.
'The executive summary of the complaint (reproduced below) highlights some of the problems encountered by married couples applying for an EEA Family Permit.  The full complaint has significantly more detail.

UK handling of EU family member visas systematically violates EU law :
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27885818/complaint/eeafp/done/UKVisaComplaintOct2012.pdf

Thursday, 15 May 2014

Sample letter to accompany a National Insurance number application

http://surinder-singh-route.info/2014/05/sample-letter-to-accompany-a-national-insurance-number-application/

Useful for returning Surinder Singhers. This and more via Surinder Singh Route Information :
http://surinder-singh-route.info/

Shared below in the interests of fair use :

Monday, 7 April 2014

Migrants' Rights Network : EU Commission calls for greater clarity on family reunion rights

http://www.migrantsrights.org.uk/news/2014/eu-commission-calls-greater-clarity-family-reunion-rights

'The European Commission has issued a new communication which aims to clarify the right to family life for EU nationals who have exercised free movement in the European Union.

'The communication addresses the situation of EU nationals who have exercised a free movement right and who then wish to sponsor a family member to join them in the country in which they are established. 

'It describes family reunification as a "necessary way of making family life possible and migrants have the right to have their close family members join them if all the conditions of the Family Reunification Directive are fulfilled'

Previously : A clear legal regime for family members of non EU citizens -
Europe moves towards providing clarity and direction on free movement rights?

http://britcits.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/european-commission-press-release-clear.html


Saturday, 5 April 2014

European Commission press release : A clear legal regime for family members of non EU citizens

http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-14-372_en.htm?locale=en

Europe moves towards providing clarity and direction on free movement rights?

'Migrants' right to family reunification is recognised throughout the EU. Common rules are in place on the conditions under which family members of a non-EU citizen, legally resident in a Member State, are allowed to enter and reside in the EU. Experience however shows the need to ensure greater coherence in the implementation of these rules.

'That is why the Commission is presenting guidance for the correct and meaningful application of the Family Reunification Directive (2003/86/EC) across Member States while avoiding possible abuses.

Wednesday, 26 March 2014

Free Movement : Surinder Singh immigration route

http://www.freemovement.org.uk/2014/03/26/surinder-singh-immigration-route/

An important and informative piece.


'The ‘Surinder Singh route’ has become well known to British citizens seeking to be reunited with their family members. The toughening up of UK immigration rules in July 2012 – particularly the introduction of the minimum income rule and its labyrinthine documentary requirements and the awful elderly dependent relative rules – is resulting in an increasing number of split families. To understand their misery and anguish, take a look at some of the comments left here and here on this blog. As recently reported, over 3,000 families had applications on hold by the Home Office pending the outcome of a test case, and that was only as of the end of December 2013. That was at least 6,000 adults and it is unknown how many of those couples have children. The numbers can only have increased since then.

'The old Court of Justice of the European Union case of Surinder Singh provides a potential means of bypassing the harsh UK immigration rules by relying instead in European Union free movement laws. But a new European case, O v The Netherlands Case C‑456/12, brings some good news and a bit of bad news...'

Wednesday, 11 December 2013

Wayne & Meliana

“The Home Office disregards Zambrano and human rights.”

Wayne is a British citizen married to Meliana, from Indonesia. Wayne and Meliana have two children together, Chloe (4) and Charlie (1) who are also British citizens. Wayne also has a child from a previous relationship: Joshua, also British. Wayne is clear: it would not be in the best interests of the children to leave the UK.

Notwithstanding the very restrictive immigration policy in Indonesia, it is not feasible for Wayne to leave the UK as doing so would mean Joshua loses contact with his father, stepmother and brother and sister.

Meliana and Wayne met whilst she was on a tourist visa in the UK. They quickly became friends, and were soon dating. It wasn't long before Meliana fell pregnant.

Knowing the situation, they approached a solicitor to discuss their options. They were advised to wait until after the birth of their child before proceeding further - as at this point the best interests of the British child would come into play.

Chloe was born in September 2009 - clearly dependent on her mother, Meliana's residence once again became legal at this point under Article 20 of the TFEU - See Zambrano: http://pearsall.eu/2013/07/case-c-3409-ruiz-zambrano/).

In 2010, Meliana began applying for a visa as the unmarried partner of Wayne noting she was the mother of Chloe. In February, the UKBA came knocking at their door. Their application was filed in May 2010 and six months later, the visa was refused – disregarding the best interest of the child, Chloe. http://pearsall.eu/2010/11/refusal-of-flrm-application/

Between February 2010 and February 2013, Meliana reported to the Immigration Reporting Centre in Solihull. The family spent money speaking with solicitors on the different elements of their case. Each time, to no avail.

In January 2013, it became clear that the 'requirement to report' was not in fact a requirement, as Meliana's residence within the country was in fact legal – if nothing else, on grounds of Zambrano. The Home Office threatened Meliana with detention and fines. They did however back down when challenged to carry out their threats:
http://pearsall.eu/2013/04/response-to-challenging-the-ise-343/

Their second child, Charlie, was then born in July 2012.


It came to Wayne's attention that the fact that he had worked in Finland prior to meeting Meliana might be beneficial, along with various other ventures conducted cross border within the EU.

In January 2013, Meliana completed her application form for a residence permit on the basis of being the primary carer of British citizens They emphasised Wayne fell into the category of Carpenter.

Meliana subsequently received a Certificate of Application for the period taken to process the application. However, in July 2013, the refusal notice came through:
http://pearsall.eu/2013/07/zambrano-and-regulation-9-refusal-notices/

Once again, no consideration of the best interests of the child as before, but this time, human rights also disregarded.

The family is now awaiting an appeal, a process which is taking over six months.

'At two and three years old respectively, it is considered that x and y are of an age where they would be able to readjust to life without you' :
http://britcits.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/on-behalf-of-secretary-of-state-for.html
http://www.freemovement.org.uk/2013/08/24/home-office-refusal-letter-young-children/

Background on Zambrano: http://www.freemovement.org.uk/2011/03/22/zambrano-considered/
Background on Mary Carpenter : http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/kingsclj14&div=7&id=&page=
More posts on Zambrano : http://britcits.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/zambrano
More posts on European free movement : http://britcits.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/europe