“I am being pushed out of my own country by this government because I dared to fall in love, have a baby with, and marry a woman who is Japanese.”
A
British citizen, Aaron met his partner, Kano, in Bristol when she was there on
a two-year working holiday visa. Kano is
from Japan.
They
fell in love, she fell pregnant and they decided to get married. Aaron has invested all his time and energy in
Bristol and is keen to make a life with his wife and child there. Bristol
is where all his friends and family live. He wants a stable place to mark the
height of his child as the years pass; he doesn’t don’t want to live in Britain
to claim any sort of welfare benefits.
However,
under the new rules, he is unable to give his child the upbringing he so
desires in his own country, something which we all as British citizens have and
should continue to have the right to.
Aaron’s
child is also British. Therefore, in fact, two British citizens have had their
basic rights eroded by this government.
-
The right to live
with your partner without interference from the State for Aaron;
-
The right to have
both your parents looking after you, for their child.
Aaron
earns just under the £18,600 mark. Combining his income with that which Kano
could earn, they easily satisfy £18,600. But Kano’s income cannot be included,
thus highlighting a huge oversight in the rules.
Not
only is £18,600 too high, it does not allow for geographical differences and is
much higher than the income criteria required to be excluded from qualifying
for welfare benefits. It also shows a complete disregard for the potential
value of the spouse’s income.
In
practice, both Aaron and Kano would work, each earning a salary that would be
taxed and relied upon for their living expenses. Why then is the criterion
restricted only to Aaron’s income?
Aaron
is being pushed out of his own country, by his own government, for no reason
other than that its mission is to achieve a poorly selected and arbitrary net
immigration target in the 'tens of thousands'.
I live in UK and my wife put visa immigration application on 25th august 2015 and she get refusal letter on 20th october 2015.
ReplyDeleteI hv attached refusal letter with this email.
it says I m not capable for financial requirement as the company is closed but I still work for this company only company has changed its name.
With this decision letter my wife got IAFT-6 form
Please can u tell me what should I do?
Do I get any response by appeal form?
Some told me that appeal process take 1 year. Is it true?
Hi, you've posted a comment on the back of an article so no attachments included. Suggest you contact a good lawyer if you decide to appeal - but yes, appealing is time consuming and potentially expensive. It may be worth seeing if there is scope to send in additional docs such as a change of company name certificate. However, speak to a good lawyer to assess your options.
DeleteThank u sonel
DeleteI have reapply
May this time my application successed
Thank u sonel
DeleteI have reapply
May this time my application successed
This stupid law is designed to make the politicians look good on election times and infringes heavily on legitimate individuals who want to marry good honest people.
ReplyDeleteEvery one ought to have the right to stay with their partner and the threshold is far too high.