“Are these the family values the
government wants to promote? Keeping parents and children/grandchildren
apart ... breaking up husbands and wives?”
“It’s ridiculous that British people now have fewer rights in Britain than even those from outside the EU... ”
Anne
is the British mother of a British son who, by this government’s
account, should not have fallen in love, married and had a child with a
lovely woman, because his child's mother happens to be American. Anne is
also the British wife and main carer of a British man who is disabled.
Anne recognises that, as she gets older, she will need assistance from her son, for herself and her husband.
The
new rules now in place mean that her son is forced to live apart from
his wife and daughter. They also mean that she is not permitted to be
with her son and daughter-in-law and is prevented from spending time
with her granddaughter.
NOTHING is right about this situation.
They
are a proud, if not rich, family. They missed the wedding of their son
to a woman who is now a much loved member of the family. While it was
painful missing her son’s wedding, the financial and practical
constraints of Anne’s husband’s disability meant that they couldn’t
travel.
They do, however, expect their son to be able to live in his home country, with his new family.
£18,600
is a lot of money for him and Anne, on top of the daily expenses of
living and substantial visa application fees (as Anne sees it, we do not
all have parliamentary salaries, generous expense accounts and cushy
pensions – Anne pays for and travels in standard class).
Anne’s
son has been saving money for a spouse visa and paying rent in the UK
while also maintaining and paying for accommodation for his wife and
child. Babies are expensive, as anyone with a child will tell you. Yet
he managed for a long time.
Until these rules came in.
The
stress of being apart from his wife and child is, in itself, difficult;
but the impact of the rules, which suggest to him that he may never be
with them, were he also to be here for his parents, caused Anne's son to
become very ill, leading to the loss of his job. So, overall, this is
now a worse situation for everyone, her son, his wife, their
granddaughter, Anne’s husband, Anne and the entire extended family and
community.
They now can’t even afford to fly to America to see the child unless friends and family help.
Are these the family values the government wants us to adopt?
Meanwhile
this whole situation is taking a very bad toll on everyone's health.
Anne is now on antidepressants and blood pressure tablets. Their
fifteen-year-old daughter is feeling the stress of the situation – she
can't understand why she can't see her little niece and sister-in-law.
Their other daughter has their son living with her as he has now also
lost his home, so has no choice but to move in with family.
The government needs to realise there are real people affected by these changes, not just government statistics. The rules were already hard to meet in the first place, the fees of hundreds of pounds were already a lot for the majority of working people.
Anyone from the EU can move to the UK with their spouse and children without having to satisfy any income criterion.
Yet now British people, in their own country, are being torn apart from their families! What has
this
government done to our country and why? Who will look after us as we
grow old? Who will look after us when we are ill? And who will answer
the questions the next generation asks about why discriminatory
and racist policies were allowed to be put in place, policies preventing
Anne's son's daughter getting to know her father and grandparents?
No comments:
Post a Comment